Chelsea Banter

 

Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)
 

In order to view all of today's banter, you may have to visit our Chelsea banter 2 and Chelsea banter 3 pages linked at the bottom of this page.

More posts are being added to the Chelsea Discussion Posts page


25 Apr 2024 13:43:56
------------Wrong page - this is the Chelsea page------------

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 16:42:55
No probs, apologies.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 09:52:13
ED025 must be well pleased after that result last night. I certainly didn't see that coming. Just shows what a difficult and competitive league this is and sometimes that is lost on people! 7th is needed for a European place and with Newcastle also losing that is still a possibility and might just be a good competition for our young squad? Or are we best off missing Thursday night football?

{Ed025's Note - i want to know what happened when we visited the Bridge G8, you whacked us mate yet we went out last night and deservedly beat Liverpool who i see as a better side than Chelsea, yes no game is easy but like you we seem to go from the sublime to the ridiculous in a very small time frame, you have to ask yourselves are our players taking the piss or what?..

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 13:14:16
I think it just shows what a top class brilliant team Everton are. The manager is also ahead of the game tactically?

But, can we play you every week.

Hope things improve for you next season Ed.

{Ed025's Note - cheers Tom, we are far from a good team mate and Dyche is a dinosaur imo, but i might just take him over Poch, not many teams give us a good hiding though like you did but you are so inconsistent that you never know which Chelsea will turn up..

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 16:15:41
My god football fans are fickle read the Liverpool pages you would think they are about to get relegated.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 16:48:50
Unbelievable isn't it seymns. Almost as bad as the 2 or 3 on here who get out of bed the wrong way every day. šŸ˜.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 15:24:04
Ed025, I applaud your response on the Liverpool site to someone who suggested the players were physically done. That excuse by players, coaches and some fans makes me angry. My late father worked on building sites six days a week into his seventies: no sick pay etc. He never complained about being tired at home only my long hair and music. Tired: what a load of tosh.

{Ed025's Note - absolutely Jimbo, i done 50 years in all kinds of weather mate and extra work of a weekend and nobody called for me to have a rest, me and your dad were probably two peas in a pod and these pampered prima-donna footballers want a rest for playing 1 game a week on average!, and i suspect they were on a bit more than us wages wise as well...but you do need a haircut.. :)

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 17:03:59
G8, do you come on here just to dig people out? Respect that other people have a different opinion to you

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 18:03:39
Horans, I havenā€™t got a clue why you would respond in the way you have to G8 but surely the reverse of your comment must also be true?

Who cares who is positive or negative about the club, owners, manager or any player. We all just give our opinions and if we are honest most of our opinions are in some way biased.

By the way, I generally enjoy your posts.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 10:39:29
Enzo now having his surgery, played through pain for the side and clearly not able to perform to his best but gutsy. I like that quality in a player. I now hope Poch pairs Conor and Moises together for the rest of the season.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 10:57:06
You'd think it will have to be since no one else is fit! It would ne nice to see Golding or Dyer get some minutes but in likelihood we'll see Mudryk playing as a 10 in a desperate attempt to get something out of him.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 11:10:53
G8, I agree, I like that determination in a player.

I also agree about Gallagher playing as a DM and I hope Poch now starts Chuka.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 11:48:09
I'm with you Tom on playing Carney. Maybe experiment with Jackson on the left? I think Blueboy suggested trying Mudryk up top? I would play Big Trev and Silva at centre back for the rest of the season.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 12:18:10
g8 and Tom agree with playing Carney.

For me this season is gone so from now to the end of the season wouldn't play anyone who is not going to be here next year, although as far as centre backs go this policy could go wrong we need Colwill fit long time out with a toe injury.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 12:44:10
Agree with CG and Moises as DMs and yes really no alternative. Would also wonder how we can get more out of our attak, we don't have many options there that either haven't been tried already and not been v successful or because of our huge injury list. Are any on it due back any time soon? Will Lavia, for instance, be fit for any game time before the end of the season? or Nkunku? I've lost track - perhaps hope - of may recover in time!

Would Mudryk up front with Jackson in 4222 formation, with CP and CC just behind them be worth trying? Should Deivid Washington also be given some game time as a sub up front?

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 13:16:35
I may well end up being wrong and that is often the case but I just canā€™t see Mudryk starting any game for Chelsea in what remains of this season.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 14:00:42
You may be right Tom. Such a pity he hasn;t (yet) become the player he would seem to have the talent to be. Possibly doesn't help such a lad that he has been playing in team with largely with other young and relatively EPL inexperienced players, so many changes through injury and rotation.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 14:18:17
You can see he has raw talent, very quick feet, explosive pace and he plays well for Ukraine. I think one of the ED's mentioned it took him time to settle and he also looks like a player who lacks confidence. Being in and out the side doesn't help either but I agree, he isn't performing anywhere near the level expected.

Agree0 0Disagree

Is Arne Slot A Good Fit For Liverpool?

25 Apr 2024 07:39:10
{Ed's Note - Nevada has posted a new article entitled, Is Arne Slot A Good Fit For Liverpool?

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 21:58:38
Football truly is a funny old game.

While I could see Palace beating Newcastle there is no way I could see Liverpool being turned over by the toffees!

I don't watch Liverpool that often but does Nunez miss a lot of chances on a regular basis?

DCL looked a handful tonight.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 22:19:09
He does Tom.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 00:11:49
Nunez is very similar to Jackson. Works his socks off and looks a fantastic player but same issues in the final third.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 12:53:11
Thereā€™s a graphic on slysports which shows that Nunez has missed 26 big chances this season. Haaland has missed 30 and Jackson 20. Those calling for Watkins or Isak should note theyā€™ve missed 20 and 15 respectively too.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 13:17:25
fuser, thatā€™s an interesting statistic. Thanks mate.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 14:02:12
Yes a v interesting stat Fuser and does put Jackson's misses in perspective. Haaland's 30 misses extraordinary.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 21:51:23
If osimhen does go to PSG who would be everyone's striker target? That is the main position we need I think rest will depend on sales. Hopefully a new keeper if we can offload Kepa and Sanchez.

But who would everyone sign upfront and why. I've stated I like Isak but he's injury prone and unlikely so probs best to stay away as good as he is. Toney is a risk seems to have a big ego and baggage. It's down to Sesko or Gyokeres for me. Gyokeres is the better goal scorer but older and in a poorer league. Sesko has massive potential but still very raw. He's been slowly introduced to the first team and has 10 goals in 27 but a lot of them games have been 20 minutes off the bench so I'm not sure. But down to Gyokeres and Sesko for me.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 22:02:29
I suppose I will have to admit defeat and except Osimhen moving to PSG.

So Barnet, I have a mate who says a forward at Lille is good but I would go for Kane. I also like the Lad from Juve but apparently that deal looks unlikely.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 23:51:30
Hard to know who to buy not many out there who are better than what we have Kane top drawer but can't see him at Chelsea would prefer a player with prem experience not convinced by Toney, always like DCL at Everton but like Issak has fitness issues of ready made prem players would go for Watkins at Villa

Sims at Coventry scores goals as does the lad at Blackburn but who knows if they are good enough for the prem but goalscorers instincts don't change . Fondly remember the days of Kerry Dixon.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 00:12:58
I would love Kane Tom but with this new ownership anyone over 25 is a no go never mind 30. Although I think heā€™d love to come back and break the goal scoring record in the prem.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 09:39:48
I love the idea of kane but Gyokeres is more likely. For epl experience, I prefer Watkins to toney. Like his clever ways. think he's underrated.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 20:37:47
Slot now looks like he's on his way to Liverpool, so there's Ed002's number-one choice for manager to replace Poch (if indeed he goes) gone.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 21:01:33
Itā€™s probably Pochā€™s best chance of staying that there will be no credible candidates left given the number of big clubs looking for a new coach.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 22:10:16
Donā€™t forget the TT return rumours!

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 22:20:53
Tom

I have forgot it already.

Agree1 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 22:35:39
Bill, love it mate. I think it was a secret TT fan pulling my leg!

Mind you strange things can happen!

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 09:51:56
Tt was the first mistake of the new owners. Wouldn't mind his return but not sure how he will cope with the current crop of young players we have. Though certain players might benefit like mudryk and even Jackson if played from the wing.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 12:55:57
TT is not a good attacking coach, if he were to come back, we might become more defensively sound but our attacking play under him was pretty abysmal so doubt heā€™d improve Mudryck or Jackson.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 14:04:57
TT seems to be a far better Cup games coach than league one from what I saw from him at CFC plus seemingly the evidence from German league with a side that has nearly always won it in recent times. And, yes, CFC under TT in the league were generally a poor watch.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 16:23:42
There is a lot of heat and animosity on here which is very understandable given how we're being run. Can I ask one of the Ed's for their professional verdict on all this?

Basically what type of players we need to sign and what they would do? From what I've read Osimhen is now heading for PSG but not 100%. Gyƶkeres, Sesko and Toney are the names that spring to mind but every signing you make is always a risky one. Toney IMO isn't as good as people make out and has baggage. Gyƶkeres is putting up number in a poor league and would he replicate it here. Sesko has been bedding in with limited minutes but has a very good goals to games ratio but he would also be raw.

I honestly have no idea where we go from here in truth. I would like Maignan and Isak but have read they both have injury troubles and are expensive.

We've wasted a lot of money on bang average players like Mudryk, Madueke, Badiashile and Disasi. There is still something there for me watching Jackson play especially off the wing but he can't keep missing easy chances as it's not good enough.

Just like one of the Ed's opinion as to what they think is best. Thanks.

{Ed001's Note - you just need some experience and offload some of the players that haven't worked out, rather than this nonsense idea of selling players from the academy for 'pure profit'. It is simply not true as it is not cheap to run an academy and so each player coming through costs money. There is not really a lot needed, you are not far off really, just a few of the overpriced junk and injury prone players that need offloading. I know you lot somehow have gained the impression that James is the best right-back in the world, despite him being utterly unable to defend even when he can stay fit. It also takes him a long time to get up to speed after an injury, then he will play well for 3 games and go missing again. He should be first out the door, followed quickly by Chilwell and Sterling and particularly Fofana that you even signed injured. He is not even a good defender anyway.

Settle the team down with a solid keeper. Then it is just about trimming the fat before it is worth considering buying anyone else. You need to stop buying players to loan out, it might seem good business but good business is winning trophies and having so much money tied up in players that never play for you is just a waste.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 19:21:49
Ed, I agree good business is winning trophies.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 19:33:46
Quite surprised youā€™d sell Fofana and James Ed but I do understand. As fans when weā€™ve seen players do well in the past we hold onto that memory and expect it to come back but we canā€™t wait forever for players to get fit and up to speed.

Is there any change on Osimhen Ed? Few months ago you posted he was almost certainly heading to Chelsea but recently Iā€™ve read he is now swaying towards a PSG move maybe due to champions league. I am not a big fan of him Iā€™ve seen him miss a lot of chance which Jackson gets crucified for. In truth I have no confidence in any striker we sign.

{Ed001's Note - I do mean Fofana the defender, so I am surprised you are surprised as I don't rate him and have been very open about that even when he was at Leicester. He was awful there.

I have never said he almost certainly headed to Chelsea, I assume it must have been Ed02 maybe? I have no idea where Osimhen is going.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 20:24:57
Yeah Fofana the defender I did like him at Leicester but his injuries are depressing it may be time to cut ties but not many teams will want an injury prone defender.

Think it was Ed02 but not 100% it was definitely on one page it may have been the arsenal one. I wouldnā€™t pay the money mentioned for him regardless as he suffers with niggles and thatā€™s the last thing we need. I like the look of Gyokeres but a lot of Chelsea accounts I follow who are quite good at rating players donā€™t like him in not sure why.

Thanks for your time and insight anyway Ed. Much appreciated.

{Ed001's Note - very welcome mate.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 23:05:39
Ed001, I entirely concur with your views. I certainly am not someone who believes James is world class for the reasons I mentioned in my earlier post. Itā€™s the same old cycle with James: returns from injury; 5 games with his minutes managed: starts fro 3 games and is ineffective: plays another 3 games and is 6/ 10 gets injured again. As for transfers whether fans moan or other clubs are in for players is totally irrelevant. The recruitment team should be focusing on players we need to strengthen the squad not who appears to be flavour of the month. There is no doubt in my mind that we have overpaid for players the exceptions being, Palmer, Gusto and Petrovic ( as a No2). I would be surprised if most supporters believed that we did not overspend on Caicedo and Enzo. When you are paying that sort of money you should be getting the finished article not a player with potential.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 23:34:02
Nigel it was ed2 and things change quickly in football.

Regarding eds reply, agree with almost everything other than the Reece James part. For that part in time he was the best RB in football (taa still a better player but James a better right back, if that makes sense) . I'd stick by him, unless we recieve huge compensation; I do think we can get past his injury troubles.

Striker for me is Osimhen, but it has to be someone affordable.

Lastly, massively agree with the 'pure profit' rubbish. I'm sure it works in FFP when used effectively because of amortisation but we've spent a billion pounds. In no way is that good business, we've sold players that are better than the ones we brought In and it has been an utter disaster.

We have brought in a few quality players and they will make our spine. I think we still need a lot of work however.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 17:59:26
Unfortunately, even with a great performance in certain games and looking like we just need fine tuning, which I still thinks the case, the fine tuning is still a ST GK W LB, which will be a huge amount of money still to be chucked at problem, which after the money we've invested already is unacceptable, 2 years into to a project, midtable with a some fortune and quick turnaround v some tough teams possibly 7th.

This leads to the conclusion of what happened with potter, what Lampards said and how it's been with poch, this project has been a disaster and genuinely feel it couldn't have been done worse by winstanly and Stewart, the data lead approach has been embarrassing on the whole, Ā£220m midfield who get dominated, wingers who look as if they skipped academy football and there talent is there but the IQ and football understanding is lost, a squad build with one striker who's a winger for majority of his career and has Only been prolific for the 8 games prior to his move,

I'd go as far as saying that before poch is moved on those 2 should be first, as a squad build there's been glaring mistakes and I don't think they can be trusted in getting it right, injuries have been horrific granted, but we looked to future and forgot about now, this u23 route we gone is boring us badly, poch, Gallagher, palmer Sterling, every pundit alive, all highlighted are serious lack of experience and leadership,
We've overpaid for every single player, even for how much he played prior at city, palmer was expensive, one success story to really come through, if all our players were made available which ones would we break even or make profit on except palmer?

Then on top of everything, there's the constant rumours of points deductions, ffp breaches, PSR issues looming, hotels sold at inflated prices

Been a tough few years, with a few carrots dangled to give us hope.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 18:26:43
Matt, at least three of our most expensive signings almost had the transfer decided because other clubs were interested.

Not that I really care but we have not ā€œoverpaidā€ in my opinion for Petrovich, Gusto, Palmer, Noni, Nkunku, Chuka and this will be a tad controversial Jackson. Of this is just my opinion and some of my assessments are based on pre Chelsea form.

Let me make it clear again i havenā€™t got a clue how many of our new signings will prove themselves to be quality players but I am prepared give them a little more time.

{Ed001's Note - that is nonsense Tom. Chelsea did not have to pay the money for them. They could have bought someone else instead or just saved the money or negotiated better.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 18:39:04
Ed, thatā€™s a fair point and one I have made before. Yea they could have walked away from all of those signings.

I doubt that the underbidding teams would have got them for significantly less.

{Ed001's Note - then they would either overpay or not have bought them either.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 19:19:01
Yep and as I said in my post of some time ago. If we hadnā€™t signed them so many fans might well of said the club lacked ambition.

{Ed001's Note - I don't see how that is of any relevance. Fans whine whether a team buys players or not. They moan they are too expensive or too cheap or not the right players or any of a million other reasons. If Chelsea are buying players to placate fans, then it is no wonder the club is in such a mess.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 19:28:00
I think we are agreeing with one another. If we sign the player some fans moan and if we donā€™t sign the player they moan. ā€™.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 13:30:58
Does any of the Ed's know what's going off with the Americans and Poch do they still have faith.

{Ed002's Note - A decision will be made at the end of the season and perhaps July 1 will prove to be an important day.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 16:39:01
Apologies if this is a stupid question, but why July 1st.

{Ed002's Note - It is the start of the new year.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 16:43:57
Thank you Ed,

Much appreciated.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 17:25:25
Thanks for the info ed002.

Agree0 0Disagree

25 Apr 2024 07:27:38
Ed I will not push you to speculate the outcome of the possible decision on the manager but I think will July 1 not late for a prospective new manager to fully assess the squad for suitable new signings. My concern is that we should not repeat the same mistakes of rushing things as the selling clubs might perceive us being desperate and request for more money.
Again I really don't know who but who do you reckon we get if poch is moved on. I'm impressed with emery at villa.

{Ed002's Note - Emery will not be moving to Chelsea.}

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 13:28:52
Imo Chelsea should not sign young talents for the first team anymore. Any new player must be proven experienced players or we will be remembered as a one time European giants. History had it that forest once won ucl. It's silly to change what made great. The core of great Chelsea team has been quality proven experienced players but boely and Co ownership came in and forced out all who had mastered the art and brought in clueless staff to change things that will never work in this generation. Chelsea whose best player is a player who left a rival team for lack of opportunity, can never be at the top level.
I also think boely and Co are working to rip off the gains made by the roman era by buying young players so that they sell them when they improve for profits. The will make us like old arsenal where they sold their best players Henry vp, fab, etc and have their fans gnashing for lack of success.
I have always believed that politics should never interfere with sports. It has killed our beloved club in forcefully taking roman out of Chelsea. Match day fans must make things difficult for the club to follow the roman polices or we may never recover the roman forcefully removal for non football reasons. Chelsea have been hijacked.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 15:23:59
If Bellingham if Fodan we wouldnā€™t be able to sign them because they are to young?
I would like us to sign the CH from Sporting Lisbon and he is young.

I would like us to sign leaders (whatever that really means) but Iā€™m certainly not going to define that by age. I think JT was only about 22 when he became our captain/ leader.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 15:35:23
Itā€™s ok to sign youngster but Bellingham and Foden are world class. We have Washington, Jackson, Madueke, Mudryk, Chukuuemeka and co who are all just potential.

As Tom stated Terry was 22 and also Lampard was young. You have to blend them in with experience and youth together not just signing loads of kids. The whole project is a joke.

I do think a good manager comes in and changes things though like Conte did after Mourinho and Tuchel after Lamps. Poch just ainā€™t it but it stems from the owners and Winstanley and Stewart first.

Agree0 0Disagree

24 Apr 2024 17:25:55
There's a difference between age and experience in terms of minutes/ seasons played in top-flight competitions. Lampard had already made 148 PL appearances for West Ham when Chelsea signed him. Experience and age are different things.

On the other hand, our player of the season had only played a handful of top-flight games for City when we signed him, so perhaps there should be exceptions.

Agree0 0Disagree

Chelsea Banter 2


Chelsea Banter 3


Chelsea Banter Archives


 

Posting / Reply Form

To post you must be logged in with a username. Please Log In or Register for a username.


 

 

 

 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass