17 Jul 2015 16:18:23
Ed
Do you think chelsea will make an improved offer for stones and how high a fee do you think we will be willing to pay
Thanks in advance
{Ed018's Note - I have no idea how high they are willing to go but I'd expect another bid at some point}
17 Jul 2015 19:08:22
Thanks ed seems like a very solid player
17 Jul 2015 20:03:22
id say stones over varane . because of the experience he's got playing in the premier league plus home grown . what do u think ed18 and others
{Ed018's Note - I'd be happy with either.}
17 Jul 2015 22:21:51
I think Varane is streets ahead of Stones right now. If given a choice, I'd go with Varane all day, no need to think twice.
17 Jul 2015 23:38:30
Varane is a league above Stones right now. Varane would displace Cahill, Stones would not.
18 Jul 2015 00:45:03
I was thinking about this transfer whole day, what if we bought stones and sold Cahill? Could put Zouma to partner Terry and learn from him directly with stones being 3rd choice CB, then we still.would have Kalas and other youngsters?
18 Jul 2015 06:29:59
Am I right in thinking that Stones name came up months ago and one of the Ed's said Chelsea could not guarantee him game time? As much as Cahill has his flaws when Terry doesn't play (Terry organises him and all the defence), Stones is for the future not a replacement for anyone at present.
18 Jul 2015 08:14:58
I believe you're right, Frensham. Someone said that Chelsea couldn't guarantee him time on the pitch.