25 Aug 2015 10:42:47
Hi new on here
I know you are all going to say that's not how transfers work but
We want pogba allegedly so why would we let them have Cuadrado on loan I know he is rubbish but I'm sure they weren't the only club willing to take him on loan, so was it a friendly gesture to sweeten a deal plus Oscar or rami going other way hopefully Oscar never quite taken to him
Plus I love hazard think he could be future best in world but wish he was more selfish like ronaldo
In front of goal. he can be a bit of a gooner always looking for that killer pass instead of just shooting
25 Aug 2015 12:01:40
Welcome, mate!
Just don't say you want Oscar to leave, he has to stay ;-)
25 Aug 2015 13:50:53
Becuase the club are business men, not kids, who get upset if they don't sell them a player
25 Aug 2015 13:56:04
I agree Oscar has to go
25 Aug 2015 15:39:29
They are two seperate deals.
Why be so petty that if they don't sell us Pogba (because we don't offer what they want), we refuse to lend them a player? How well do you think other clubs would deal with us, if we took that tact?
You have to remove your emotion from transfers. As Ed002 constantly says, playersare simply transcient employees of the clubs. They come and go, while the club remains.
25 Aug 2015 17:29:24
Sure, we all saw how fantastic Chelsea negotiated concerning Abdul Baba Rahman. We were not held for ransom at all.
Players are like any other good, they worth as much is someone ready to pay for them.
There's no difference if we pay 100m€ for Pogba or 50m€ for Stones or 30m€ for almost unknown fellow like Abdul Rahman Baba.
25 Aug 2015 20:09:27
Gianfranco, Cuadrado is not rubbish, he simply couldn't adapt to PL football style. That was bad estimation made by people who decided to sign him.