Chelsea Rumours 20355

 

Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.


20 Jan 2016 17:15:42
Guess, we are signing Pato then lads, thoughts on what you all expect from him.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2016 17:49:40
We're ****ed.

20 Jan 2016 17:50:17
Has disaster written all over it - we really need to sort out the transfer policy - who sanctioned Djobuti (sp. )? Why has Rahman at £20m been left on the bench? How we could now do with Mata, Lukaku, De Bruyne and Luiz!

20 Jan 2016 18:11:37
Spot on! And yet I have seen no one involved in those decisions losing his job. And don't give me this panel, group, advisers story. Failure cannot be ignored or focused just on the Manager.

20 Jan 2016 18:32:31
Bet he's a success if we sign him he's what we need when he was at his best hope he reaches it again he's a box finisher ad be quite happy to be fair.

20 Jan 2016 18:58:54
Going to better then an injured falcao . at leaSt we have another option if signed. Give me a chance prob a small fee too.
We all wanted him in Ancelotti daY's at cfc.

20 Jan 2016 19:09:20
Agreed wheely but I hope he doesn't limit the chances of Kenedy. Honestly I don't know what to expect a part of me is hoping for a reincarnation like what happened to Coutinho at pool, Bojan at Stoke off the top of my head. He was brilliant first three years at Milan let's hope a miracle could bring him back to his best.

20 Jan 2016 19:30:52
Yeah true I hope it don't limit kenedy playing time either. Prob won't with kenedy being a left or right winger.
Let's all hope he does well. Better having a striker with a small fee over his head and not expected to do well . than 50 mill striker expected to hit the floor running n to score 30 a. season.

21 Jan 2016 08:01:17
The club is also a business. When players don't want to wait for 1st team opportunities and have a detrimental effect on the squad I think selling them is often the best answer.

I agree that we have let a lot of talent leave the club, but there are reasons behind this. Haven't they also usually been good deals from a financial perspective?

21 Jan 2016 13:16:48
I have said numerous times that our pre-season transfer dealings last time were a disgrace and I know some like Pedro and want to see Rahman given a chance but the fact is they are not good enough. Now we read that we 'may' be interested in Pato a brilliant player for a short spell who has never fulfilled the potential he had and rumoured to 'possibly' be on his way to us. Clubs must be sick of Lavazzi being hawked around but if all is to be believed, not us. To me he is an impact player only and cannot last 90 minutes so are we that desperate that we will waste more money? Our fall from grace in such a short space of time is staggering.







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass