Chelsea banter 21773

 

Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.



27 Nov 2016 23:19:23
Just realised Pedro has a 1 in 4 record for us from the wing. That's not that bad.

Agree0 Disagree1

28 Nov 2016 09:44:31
I think the more he plays the better he will do. I like him a lot and brings quite a bit to the team. I would like to see what Fabregas will do if presented with 20 min left on the clock. Maybe replacing Matic for that time?

28 Nov 2016 18:38:04
Quick thought, Fabregas played as a false 9 for Spain and Barcelona atimes and for Barcelona was atimes a secondary striker and was quite prolific in front of goal maybe it might be worth trying him there think he'll be a better fit to the role than playing deeper in this formation, thoughts?

28 Nov 2016 19:03:14
I think that would be an option if we went back to 4-2-4 but personally think he'll move on.

28 Nov 2016 20:06:47
Whould hate to see him move on though. He does have quality maybe a 2nd striker. i dnt know.

29 Nov 2016 14:54:38
I think fabreagas best position would be in a 3 man midfield, have the energy and power of matic and Kante with fabreagas knitting everything together, passing creating and dictating play, when we attack he would arrive in the box becoming the 3 rd forward behind hazard and Costa, and when we defend he goes back goal side and is another body between ball and our goal, I think first half against Spurs we was crying out for the 3rd man in midfield and higher ball possesion, I think city on Saturday will have a similar pattern.

29 Nov 2016 18:40:15
@CAT I fully agree. Good standpoint about Fab.







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass